Targeted ADAMTS-13 replacement therapy for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic disorder associated with a severe deficiency of ADAMTS-13-the protease that cleaves von Willebrand factor. Plasma therapy is the current standard of care for managing acute episodes of TTP, which involves removing patient plasma and replacing it with donor plasma to raise the level of ADAMTS-13 activity. Recently, therapies aimed at replacing ADAMTS-13 have been investigated as possible substitutes or add-ons to plasma therapy for congenital and immune-mediated TTP. Enzyme replacement therapy provides recombinant ADAMTS-13 via intravenous (i.v.) infusion to restore enzyme activity. Recombinant ADAMTS-13-loaded platelets localize to the site of thrombus formation in a more concentrated manner than enzyme replacement or plasma therapy. ADAMTS-13-encoding messenger RNA aims to induce a steady supply of secreted protein and gene therapy is a potentially curative strategy. Overall, targeted ADAMTS-13 replacement therapies may provide better outcomes than plasma therapy by achieving higher levels of ADAMTS-13 activity and a more sustained response with fewer adverse events. Herein, we describe targeted ADAMTS-13 replacement therapies for the treatment of TTP and discuss the advantages and limitations of each approach.

T cell-mediated autoimmunity in immune thrombocytopenia.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a low platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. In addition to anti-platelet autoantibodies, CD8+ T cells have been implicated as a mechanism of platelet destruction. The current evidence for the existence of platelet-specific CD8+ T cells in ITP is inconclusive. The purpose of this review is to summarize the studies that investigated CD8+ T cells in ITP and to review the methods that have been used to detect autoreactive CD8+ T cells in other autoimmune diseases.

The sensitivity and specificity of platelet autoantibody testing in immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a diagnostic test.

Essentials The diagnosis of ITP is based on a platelet count < 100 × 109  L-1 and exclusion of other causes. There are no standard tests or biomarkers to diagnose ITP. The sensitivity of platelet autoantibody testing is low (53%). The specificity is high (> 90%). A positive autoantibody test can be useful to rule in ITP but a negative does not rule out ITP. SUMMARY: Background Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a low platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. The sensitivity and specificity of platelet autoantibody tests is variable and their utility is uncertain. Objective The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of platelet autoantibody tests in the diagnosis of ITP. Methods Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception until 31 May 2018. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and extracted data. Studies that reported testing results for antiplatelet autoantibodies on platelets (direct tests) or in plasma/serum (indirect tests) for 20 or more ITP patients were included. Results Pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a random effects model. Pooled estimates for the sensitivity and specificity of direct anti-platelet autoantibody testing for either anti-glycoprotein IIbIIIa or anti-glycoprotein IbIX were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-61%) and 93% (95% CI, 81-99%), respectively. For indirect testing, the pooled estimates for the sensitivity and specificity were 18% (95% CI, 12-24%) and 96% (95% CI, 87-100%), respectively. Conclusions Autoantibody testing in ITP patients has a high specificity but low sensitivity. A positive autoantibody test can be useful for ruling in ITP, but a negative test does not rule out ITP.

How do we diagnose immune thrombocytopenia in 2018?

In this report, we will review the various clinical and laboratory approaches to diagnosing immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), with a focus on its laboratory diagnosis. We will also summarize the results from a number of laboratories that have applied techniques to detect anti-platelet autoantibodies as diagnostic tests for ITP. Although there is considerable variability in methods among laboratories, there is general agreement that platelet autoantibody testing has a high specificity but low sensitivity. This suggests several possibilities: (1) the ideal test for ITP has yet to be developed, (2) current test methods need to be improved, or (3) ITP is the clinical expression of a variety of thrombocytopenic disorders with different underlying mechanisms. Even the clinical diagnosis of ITP is complex, and experienced clinicians do not always agree on whether a particular patient has ITP. Improvements in the diagnostic approach to ITP are necessary to improve the management of this disorder.

Megakaryocyte apoptosis in immune thrombocytopenia.

The mechanisms of platelet underproduction in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) remain unknown. While the number of megakaryocytes is normal or increased in ITP bone marrow, further studies of megakaryocyte integrity are needed. Megakaryocytes are responsible for the production of platelets in the bone marrow, and they are possible targets of immune-mediated injury in ITP. Since the biological process of megakaryocyte apoptosis impacts platelet production, we investigated megakaryocyte DNA fragmentation as a marker of apoptosis from ITP bone marrow biopsies. Archived bone marrow biopsy specimens from ITP patients, bone marrow specimens from controls with normal platelet counts, and bone marrow specimens from thrombocytopenic controls with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were evaluated. Sections were stained with anti-CD61 for megakaryocyte enumeration, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling was used as an apoptotic indicator. In ITP patients, megakaryocyte apoptosis was reduced compared to nonthrombocytopenic controls. Megakaryocyte apoptosis was similarly reduced in thrombocytopenic patients with MDS. These results suggest a link between megakaryocyte apoptosis and platelet production.

The effect of rituximab on anti-platelet autoantibody levels in patients with immune thrombocytopenia.

Rituximab is an effective therapy resulting in a platelet count improvement in 60% of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Rituximab depletes B cells; thus, a reduction in platelet autoantibody levels would be anticipated in patients who achieve a clinical response to this treatment. The objectives of this study were to determine whether rituximab was associated with a reduction in platelet autoantibody levels, and to correlate the loss of autoantibodies with the achievement of a treatment response. We performed a case-control study nested within a previous randomized controlled trial of standard therapy plus adjuvant rituximab or placebo. We measured platelet-bound anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIbIIIa and anti-GPIbIX using the antigen capture test. Of 55 evaluable patients, 25 (45%) had a detectable platelet autoantibody at baseline. Rituximab was associated with a significant reduction in anti-GPIIbIIIa levels (P = 0·02) but not anti-GPIbIX levels (P = 0·51) compared with placebo. Neither the presence of an autoantibody at baseline nor the loss of the autoantibody after treatment was associated with a response to rituximab. The subset of patients with persistent autoantibodies after treatment failed to achieve a platelet count response, suggesting that persistence of platelet autoantibodies can be a marker of disease severity.